Republican Jen

Political intuition from a musician Houstonian.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

"The Sneeches" by Dr. Seuss

If I may, I'd like to make a recommendation for a Christmas gift. If there is a young child that you are looking to purchase a gift for, might you consider a book instead of a toy? And might you consider this book called "The Sneeches" by Dr. Seuss?

Why this book over the other Dr. Seuss books? In this book is a very important message that I remember learning when I was a small child. You see, some of the Sneeches have little green stars on their bellies and some do not, and they turn their noses up at each other. Then, some Seussian dude comes along and creates a machine that gives them a choice whether or not to have the star tattooed on their bellies.

What follows is what I consider to be a classic example of commercialism and doing what's "popular" gone bad. They all run through his machine, forking over lots of cash each time, just so they can keep up with what the current "trend" or train of thought seems to be.

Lo and behold, the Sneeches all run out of cash. Then, they all decide to get along because the Seussian dude with the machine obviously milked them for all they were worth with his ridiculous propaganda.

To me, this book promotes individuality. I thought the Sneeches acted like silly characters then, and I think the same now. Atleast until they come to their senses. Why rush to waste your money in order to keep up with the lastest "popular thought" at the time. Why would anyone let Paris Hilton tell them how to act, dress or speak?

Kids should be taught to be happy with themselves, to think independently and to not rush to judgements. This book promotes this kind of thinking, and it's very good for children.

The perfect conservative Christmas gift!

Monday, November 27, 2006

Jkarl on the Next Two Years

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

The 2006 elections have passed into history and, as is the beauty in a nation where freedom is allowed to flourish, the Democrats emerged victorious by virtue of providing both the more appealing message and the better ability to galvanize their base. To be sure, they were aided immeasurably by the Republicans who found themselves in disarray for not only abandoning their long standing principles of limited government and fiscal responsibility but also for their feckless desertion of the President in pandering to perceived public opinion against his Iraq war policy.

It should not require the application of a two by four to the head for the leadership of the Republican Party to realize that inconsistency, spendthrift and disloyalty do not exactly generate a high degree of optimism among the Independent voter whose support is so crucial to winning elections. Nevertheless, the Democrats won fair and square by virtue of superior campaign organization and execution and are to be congratulated for that success.

Hand in hand with victory comes responsibility; however, a factor the Democrats have not been forced to face in the Congress for the past 12 years. No longer do they have the luxury of sideline box seats from which to complain, point fingers, obstruct legislation and generally engage in second guessing, criticism and advice, a particular advantage which accrues to those who bear no responsibility for the success or failure of their recommended courses of action or inaction.

The primary campaign themes of the Democratic Party included the unpopularity of both the war and the President, the economy, the need for a change and the ubiquitous "culture of corruption." While the charges of corruption are ever present, it is axiomatic that neither party has a monopoly on criminal behavior and that the party in power enjoys the somewhat dubious distinction of increased visibility. Corruption is overblown as an overriding election issue, a fact made more obvious by Speaker of the House Elect Pelosi's advancing John Murtha as her choice for Majority Leader and Alcee Hastings for the Intelligence Committee Chair—neither Member being noted for sterling repute nor character.

The war and the economy as well may prove to be tenuous matters for Democratic leadership for different reasons. The Democrats have long advised pulling out of Iraq with the courses of action ranging from immediate redeployment to timed or phased withdrawal. Admittedly, while seeing an end to the Iraq War is embraced by virtually every American, the consequences obtaining from an abrupt change of direction could easily result in unmitigated disaster. The recent appearance of Generals Abizaid and Casey before Congress recommending no immediate reduction of troop strength hands the party now in power a dilemma hitherto not faced----whether to heed or to override the military's recommendations.

With the stock market at record level and the nation enjoying essentially full employment, the Democrats could be riding the proverbial tiger inasmuch as a drop in either would be viewed as a failure. Their embracement of raising the minimum wage as a panacea to lift income levels across the board is speculative at best and dangerous at worst as those earning at or near minimum wage comprise but two percent of the population, 85 percent of whom are single and still live at home. Most serious economists subscribe to the theory that hiking the entry level wage will cost jobs, particularly among the young and unskilled.

The Democratic Party planned and executed its victory over both Houses of Congress with skill and precision and most of us, regardless of party affiliation, wish them every success and hope for a spirit of cooperation to prevail in those issues of national importance. However, the transition to the position of power will cause them to realize that it is much easier to criticize than to create and that a winner should eschew exacting revenge if for no other reason than that payback can be....well.....it purports to be an interesting two years.

J Karl Colonel USMC Retired

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Interesting photos from Turkey





These photos are from Turkey as these radical religious activists protest the Pope's arrival in their country.

All the photos above were photoshopped except for the last one. Notice how they use the word "God" as if the name for the Christian God were the same for their Islamic one. No, they do not know the same God that Christians know.

I just have one question... Who has the Pope killed lately? Who has Osama bin Laden killed lately? I think we know the answer.
Hat tip: LGF http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?
entry=23475_Turkish_Islamists_Demonstrate_Against_Pope_Benedict#comments

"No" to the 'burqini'

What you see to the left is a picture of a woman wearing a 'burqini', or an Islamic two piece bathing suit. Once again, oppression of women is being touted as fashionable and mainstream. Can I get a "hell no, we won't go?" N.O.W.? Liberal women? Anyone?

Notice that the woman that is actually in the swimming pool is wearing a normal bathing suit (plus), but after taking another look at this photo... what is that covering her head? Did they actually black her face out or put some kind of oppressive Islamic covering on her? Weird.

Aussie Lifesavers Recruit Muslims with the 'burqini'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?
xml=/news/2006/11/26/woz26.xml

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Happy Thanksgiving





I am thankful for alot of things. Family, friends... baby on the way!
I am also thankful for this blog where I can state my point of view.
I need to make better use of it!
God bless you all and remember those who are away from home in the military.
http://www.grizzlypoint.com/tg/2006tdm1.html

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Happy Veteran's Day!

If you have the chance, go to your local Veteran's Day parade! It's a pretty day outside. Be sure to give our American veterans the howdy and thanks they deserve.

And also for your informative reading, Dr. Rusty Shackleford wrote an op ed for Townhall.com with a comparison of Rush Limbaugh and Jon Stewart and their affect on elections.

Jon Stewart: Democratic majority kingmaker
http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/RustyShackleford/2006/11/10/jon_
stewart_democratic_majority_kingmaker

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

I'm not Looking Forward to the Next Two Years

After the Democrats took the House last night, I felt like being quite angry. I'm not sure who to be angry with, but the first person who came to mind was Sen. John McCain. He is the one who planted the seeds of doubt within the Republican Party about President Bush and other Republicans, thus giving the MSM the fodder it needed years ago to help bring about this loss. His good buddy Mark DeWine lost his re-elected, as did Lincoln Chaffee. I'm not sure whether or not that'd a good thing just yet.

As one chatter said last night, "America has just been goosed."

Like I said, I'm not looking forward to the next two years, and if you wonder why, I give you a headline provided by AOL when I logged on.

"HAMAS WING URGES ATTACKS ON AMERICAN TARGETS"

"GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (Nov. 8) - Hamas' military wing called Wednesday on Muslims around the world to attack American targets following reports that an Israeli tank strike killed 18 people in the Gaza Strip town of Beit Hanoun.

The Hamas-led Palestinian government distanced itself from the call, saying its fight was with Israel.

Hamas militants have historically directed their suicide bombings and rocket attacks only against Israeli targets.

"America is offering political, financial and logistic cover for the Zionist occupation crimes, and it is responsible for the Beit Hanoun massacre. Therefore, the people and the nation all over the globe are required to teach the American enemy tough lessons," Hamas' military wing said in a statement sent to The Associated Press.

But Ghazi Hamad, spokesman for the Hamas-led Palestinian government, said the group had no intention of attacking American targets.

Hamas' political wing, led by Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh, tries to distinguish itself from the military wing. But the two entities both report to the group's exiled leadership, based in Syria, and frequently coordinate with each other.

Palestinian witnesses and officials said earlier Wednesday that Israeli tank shells had crashed into a residential neighborhood, killing at least 18 people, including eight children, in their sleep.

Haniyeh said efforts to form a national unity government with moderate President Mahmoud Abbas were suspended because of the attack. Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz ordered the army to halt artillery attacks in Gaza.

But an Israeli government spokesman said Israel will continue its operations in Gaza aimed at halting Palestinian rocket attacks.

"Our battle is against the occupation on the Palestinian land. We have no interest to transfer the battle," Hamad said, though he called America indirectly responsible for Wednesday's bloodshed because of its support for Israel.

"We urge the Arab nation and the governments of the Arab countries to protest the world's silence and the American bias," he said.

The U.S., like Israel, considers Hamas a terrorist group."

"IT" has begun.

WTG Democrats and those who voted for them. You have just emboldened the enemy to attack us again. AND THEY WILL ON AMERICAN SOIL.

We have 4.4% unemployment with a strong economy, and you punish the people who helped bring it to you. And those in Virginia found it important to vote for a pedophile.

What a big disappointment.

Tuesday, November 07, 2006

Tuesday, Nov. 7! Voting Day!

Monday, November 06, 2006

Janjaweed Still on Rampage in Sudan


The first picture is of a village in Sudan that was destroyed by the Janjaweed by fire. The second picture is of a Janjaweed, "devil on horseback".

I remember about a year ago, the Arab insurgents who have taken over the north of Sudan signed a peace treaty with the original African inhabitants of the south of Sudan. But did the Arabs call off the Janjaweed? Apparently not.

"GHEBESH, Sudan -- Wearing pristine uniforms and carrying new guns, Arab militia on horses and camels rode into Mariam Abakr Yehya's Darfur village early in the morning of Oct. 29, witnesses said.

Her 3-year-old son Adam was torn from her embrace and shot dead by the intruders, who killed more than 50 people and looted all they could find in the village.

"Why? why? My heart is broken," she cried as her family tried to calm her down. "Next time they said they would kill this one," she said, referring to her baby boy.
The militia attacked three villages and one refugee camp, singling out mostly children, the witnesses said.


"They took the babies and children from their mothers' arms, beat the women, and shot the children," said Adam Gamer Umar. "They said, 'We're killing your sons and when you have more we will come and kill them too,' " he added.

"They were shouting, 'Where are you, slaves?' " said Babiker al-Nur Abdallah, comforting an elderly relative who had buried his head in his hands in grief. "The government and the Arabs want this land for them; they want to . . . make us their slaves.""

Well, there ya go. I wonder if the word they used was "dhimmi". The War on Terror should extend to this country, IMO. Over 200,000 dead and 2.5 million displaced, many of them running to the country of Chad. What will the African Union do, if anything? Will the Arabs in Sudan one day not be content with having that country and attack Chad?

We shall see.

Darfur Villagers Mourn Slain Children
http://www.boston.com/news/world/africa/articles/2006/
11/06/darfur_villagers_mourn_slain_children/

Sunday, November 05, 2006

"Coming to America" Video

I don't know about y'all, but I needed this one. :) Hey, even us young uns can appreciate a good Neil Diamond song.

Saturday, November 04, 2006

NY Times Accidentally Admits to Nukes in Iraq

If I understand correctly, the US Government put up a website that consists of documents found in Iraq while Saddam Hussein was still in power. According to the NYTimes, "some experts" say the documents are dangerous to have on the internet because there could be a recipe for nuclear weapons in them. Hm.......

Why would documents from the late 1990s and early 2000s in Iraq have "recipes" for atomic weapons if there was no nuclear proliferation in Iraq and we were all lied to to go to war for "oil" like Democrats say?

"The documents, roughly a dozen in number, contain charts, diagrams, equations and lengthy narratives about bomb building that nuclear experts who have viewed them say go beyond what is available elsewhere on the Internet and in other public forums. For instance, the papers give detailed information on how to build nuclear firing circuits and triggering explosives, as well as the radioactive cores of atom bombs."

You don't say? Hmm...

Seems like some documents were already taken off of the website because they spoke of the construction of chemical weapons. No less it was the United Nations that found these particular documents and requested their removal from the website. An interesting admission from a group of governments many of which would not help rid Iraq of an evil dictator because of a so-called lack of evidence for WMDs. These documents make them look very very bad, so of course they won't want all of us looking at them.

As for the nuclear weapons...

"In Europe, a senior diplomat said atomic experts there had studied the nuclear documents on the Web site and judged their public release as potentially dangerous. “It’s a cookbook,” said the diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of his agency’s rules. “If you had this, it would short-circuit a lot of things.”"

Oh really???

"Ray E. Kidder, a senior nuclear physicist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, an arms design center, said “some things in these documents would be helpful” to nations aspiring to develop nuclear weapons and should have remained secret."

Really???

"On Sept. 20, the site posted a much larger document, “Summary of technical achievements of Iraq’s former nuclear program.” It runs to 51 pages, 18 focusing on the development of Iraq’s bomb design. Topics included physical theory, the atomic core and high-explosive experiments. By early October, diplomats and officials said, United Nations arms inspectors in New York and their counterparts in Vienna were alarmed and discussing what to do."

REALLLLLLLLYYYYYYYYYYY????????

And I'm supposed to be upset that these things were on the internet after all the grief that has been laid on President Bush about the Second Gulf War? It was Republicans who twisted John Negroponte's arm to make these documents public because the information had overwhelmed the information community and to expose the truth about Hussein's WMDs. Sounds like it worked to me. Putting these documents on the internet has not only brought out the truth that Hussein was indeed still proliferating WMDs but has made the entire information community of the world take notice.

WTG, Hoekstra and Roberts!

U.S. Web Archive is Said to Reveal a Nuclear Primer
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/03/world/middleeast/03documents.html?_r=2&ei=5094&en=1511d6b3da302d4f&hp=&ex=1162530000&partner=homepage
&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin&oref=slogin


Very interesting blog that is translation the documents into English:
http://www.iraqdocs.blogspot.com/